As we know, the general public has a tendency to get blinded by flashy headlines implicating allegations of illicit sex, large sums of money and embarrassing details. It’s a tool often used by the establishment to divert the attention from matters that may have far heavier repercussions.

Is this another case of diversion orchestrated by certain - perhaps vulnerable - forces? Is this a case of engaging a trigger happy mainstream media to divide public attention from more obscure activities? Is the Spitzer affair robbing the public of real news?

Could it be another attempt by mainstream media focusing attention on exactly what their financiers want them to in order to protect high profile implicated participants?

Or is this only a successful plan of action resulting in bulging bank accounts? Apparently the prostitute/singer involved in the case could have made a small fortune on sudden downloads of her previously unknown music (and good luck to her…).

Ask these questions of Google and an alleged Spitzer 911 cover up surfaces. (more articles|1|2|3).

And what about the still unanswered petition (Open Letter) to Eliot Spitzer from 9/11 CitizensWatch regarding the NY Attorney General’s Complicity in Cover-up of key Intelligence regarding the attacks of September 11th 2001.

“(If) Spitzer will NEVER be charged, it will completely disclose the entire 9/11 conspiracy. So, did the “conspirators” bring him down, to protect themselves? Why is everyone so desperate to get rid of him? Why aren’t the Democrats fighting?“(quote)

Some sources:
Spitzer v. Fallon: Tales of a Prostituted Press (article)
911 BLOGGER.COM
PIRATENEWS - 911 CON
New York MEGAPHONE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rich - newsphiles.org